Graduated at this fine institution: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89col ... 3%A9rieure
https://www.etsmtl.ca/
What about you ? Got anything interesting to use as a substitute for tapestry ?
Moderator: Moderators
Graduated at this fine institution: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89col ... 3%A9rieure
We already know that universities exist.eslapion wrote: ↑Sat Jun 27, 2020 6:18 pmGraduated at this fine institution: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89col ... 3%A9rieure
https://www.etsmtl.ca/
What about you ? Got anything interesting to use as a substitute for tapestry ?
So you want proof ? Is that it ?
Still not documented information
Same thing for you buddy. You have no qualifications at all.
Yup! Please tell the Most Crappy Electronics Supplier...
For exposing a thesis I always explain the elements that I found relevant and the line that link them, so I use the evidence of the facts for sustain thesis, this method let the possibility for having a serious exchange of ideas wit others: it is a not-dogmatic method based on the ideas, so who I am is irrelevant.
Prove that
I don't think I can. Legally I mean.
Gyro Gearloose wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:41 pmI don't think I can. Legally I mean.
No, of course not. All you have to do is repeat misconceptions that you know are popular with amateurs and then demonstrate a lot of people agree with you. That's a nice substitute for science.MCes wrote: ↑Sun Jun 28, 2020 11:51 pmFor exposing a thesis I always explain the elements that I found relevant and the line that link them, so I use the evidence of the facts for sustain thesis, this method let the possibility for having a serious exchange of ideas wit others: it is a not-dogmatic method based on the ideas, so who I am is irrelevant.
I never used my titles to pretend to be right, so I have not to demonstrate them.
It's not my job to give you an EE course. When you don't understand something I post, you start acting like a pouty child.The proof won't transform the idiocies to pearls of wisdom, but can help to clarify.
This concept is based on supposition that you have the competence for do it, but..... this is a
What you're doing is called 'rhetoric' and has nothing to do with science.