Bad PAL display outputs revisited.

Modding and Technical Issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
matsondawson
The Most Noble Order of Denial
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:44 pm

Bad PAL display outputs revisited.

Post by matsondawson »

I was browsing some TV docs today and noticed that PAL stands for Phase Alternating Line. This is a reference to the colour burst signal being inverted on alternate lines. Then it clicked as to what the issue is with these systems.
The phase of the composite colour pin is advanced, I'm guessing either due to age of the vic, or age of the capacitors in the colour output stage.
It always appeared to me that the colour burst was coming out inverted on alternate lines, but I never realised that's what's meant to happen.
So, has anyone attempted replacement of the capacitors (maybe even resisters) in the colour output stage? Or, if the VIC is dodgy, maybe altering the values of the capacitors to delay the phase back to the correct value.
It may be preferable to some, rather than doing the s-video mod.

An example of what I'm talking about...

Image
User avatar
Mike
Herr VC
Posts: 4841
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:57 pm
Location: Munich, Germany
Occupation: electrical engineer

Post by Mike »

With PAL, the red component of the colour difference signal is alternated in sign on consecutive lines. Should a phase shift occur in the TV signal, with PAL this only leads to desaturation of the colour, not a shift in the hue as with NTSC.

The alternate zig-zag pattern (I presume you mean the image of the cyan border) results from cross-talk between chroma & luma. It cannot be avoided unless the combination of both within the video circuitry is *not* done, but both signals are left separated, as done in the S-Video mod.

In case you meant the two faint lines in the left cyan border, this is the VIC chip fetching information to display the first character on each line.

Michael
matsondawson
The Most Noble Order of Denial
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:44 pm

Post by matsondawson »

I replaced the electrolytics and it had no effect.

But... I replace the 230 ohm resistor on the diagonal from FB7 to R10 with a 3k and there was major improvement. The unreadable red cards on Poker are now readable. There is a *slight* drawback though, in that you get a little bit of blue bleading into the blacks.

Maybe a little bit of some sort of RC filter there would have a better effect.
matsondawson
The Most Noble Order of Denial
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:44 pm

Post by matsondawson »

It may be that by making the colour signal smaller, it interferes less with the intensity of the image.
User avatar
orion70
VICtalian
Posts: 4341
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Occupation: Biologist

Post by orion70 »

Before modding the VIC components, have you tried the trimmers?
matsondawson
The Most Noble Order of Denial
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:44 pm

Post by matsondawson »

Yes, no effect.
Trimmers only affect the intensity band, and tune the clock not to produce bad harmonics.
mr zetec
Vic 20 Drifter
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:36 pm

Post by mr zetec »

I would seriously like to see a viable solution to the Vic video problems. If anyone has a good guide I am all ears!
a4000bear
Vic 20 Amateur
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:01 pm
Location: Australia

Post by a4000bear »

As far as I'm concerned, the only viable way to correct the VIC's video problems is to do the modification to S-Video, which can be found in the Wiki, or elsewhere on Denial.

Composite PAL and NTSC are never really much good for displaying computer graphics, and very little can be done to improve it.
mr zetec
Vic 20 Drifter
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:36 pm

Post by mr zetec »

The guide unfortunately has some holes and grey areas. I used it but it did not cover my Vic exactly and did not work. I ended up returning my Vic to its original configuration. As I have said loads of times already; I would really like to find a guide I could use that works!
Post Reply