i'm not trying to tell you what you should do at all. i told you what i would do, big difference
Then by all means do it then.
if you dont want to hear things like that, you shouldnt start threads like that. that said, i find any kind of cpu acceleration for classic computers utterly pointless, especially if they are not 100% compatible
So according to you:
1. Its pointless to accelerate
2. Nothing is ever really going to be 100% compatible when accelerated so nobody should consider your advice or point of view anyways...
So what exactly can you contribute to this thread other than nagging?
It was started so people could make a contribution, Mike did. have you?
I don't consider saying its pointless to be a highly positive contribution...
You suddenly have a lot of consideration for Gideon but you consider his 6502 VHDL code to be flawed and the same for his VIAs... go figure.
Do you consider the 65XX code of the Chameleon to be 100% compatible? If not, why are you whining at me?
I initially considered using a W65C02 but then I realized there were problems with that chip so this thread was mothballed, IMHO.
As for what you said about PLAs, PLAnkton right now is the only PLA substitute which is true 100% compatible. SuperPLA V3 will not run on a 326298, it will not run FastLoad and it will not run on a KU-14194; Because I paid attention to 5 specific details. Why you and Schönfeld didn't baffles me; he even balked at me saying I was thinking too much in analog terms yet that's what made it possible.
Be normal.